SYMBIAN ON THE LINE

the new S60 Online Blog 
« Back to blog

facts, not fiction

From last year, the first half of 2009 shows that in smartphones, Nokia, RIM-Blackberry and Apple have grown market share. HTC has held steady. In the operating systems, Symbian has shrunk but still commands half of the global market. RIM and Apple are big rivals and growing. Android is a tiny rival and growing. Windows Mobile is crashing and Palm is nearly invisible. I would appreciate it, if future journalists reporting on smartphones bother to quote the facts, not some silly analysis of "market shares" based on Admob stats etc.

You can always count on Tomi Ahonen to set the record straight, when it comes to the mobile world. And here he does that beautifully yet again. If you're not going to read his entire post, I will be angry at you. Seriously.

I hope you have read it all.

Now, I have a few things to add so that when bloggers want to report on something like this again, they'll know what it is they're writing about.

The thing everyone quoted when they recently said that the iPhone has a 40+% market share in smartphones was an AdMob statistic. Let's pause here for a bit.

AdMob is a leading mobile ad network. But what isn't 'leading' these days? Anyway. Their stats refer, naturally I'd say, to the 'content' they serve. Ads, specifically. Now, on the sites or apps or whatnot that have AdMob ads on them, that percentage of visits came from the iPhone and so on.

Get it?

Good.

Now there are always some stats floating around that show that the iPhone is 'leading' mobile internet usage.

This is normal. Remember, when you buy an iPhone, you are REQUIRED to purchase a monthly data plan (absurdly expensive too, in most cases). This is something you probably are made aware of when you make the purchase.

You are aware of the fact that you're paying a bucketload of money per month for internet access.

Isn't it then reasonable to think that you'll use it? I mean, isn't t reasonable for you to say "well, if they make me pay for it, I might as well try it?".

Exactly.

As for what market share should mean (and really does, if you know anything about anything), that's sold devices. Where you can go to Tomi's numbers for reference. Because they're not his. They're quoted from the companies that actually, you know, report on market shares for a living.

Thanks.

Comments (2)

Oct 08, 2009
mobithinking said...
AdMob is a leading mobile ad network, but its just one of many. However it generates a lot of publicity through producing these reports, which are often blown out of proportion/misinterpreted by those journalists/bloggers that have of late become obsessed by cell-phone operating systems. This has encouraged other leading mobile ad networks to produce reports that suggest entirely different results, to help them get some free publicity too. If you are interested in ad networks, the leading ones are profiled here: http://mobithinking.com/mobile-ad-network-guide - if you are interested in what the leading cell phone operating system go to Gartner et al (as Tomi suggests).
Oct 08, 2009
Vlad Bobleanta said...
Cool. Thanks for commenting and making AdMob's position clearer.

Leave a comment...

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     twitter